Search for: "Application of Jones" Results 501 - 520 of 3,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2011, 11:03 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Geary v JD Wetherspoon Plc [2011] EWHC 1506 (QB) (14 June 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Harris v Jones & Ors [2011] EWHC 1518 (Ch) (14 June 2011) Shetty v Al Rushaid Petroleum Investment Company & Ors [2011] EWHC 1460 (Ch) (09 June 2011) Future Publishing Ltd v The Edge Interactive Media Inc & Ors [2011] EWHC 1489 (Ch) (13 June 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) R, R (on the application of) v London Borough of… [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:21 am by Eliana Baer
Considering all the applicable statutory factors, under the totality of the circumstances, Judge Jones ordered that the husband pay the wife $350 per week in pendente lite alimony, which he noted may be considered “too high” by the husband and “too low” by the wife. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 12:35 pm by Parks & Jones
The post Applying for Medicare with an Elder Lawyer appeared first on Parks & Jones. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 2:56 am
Jones submitted four articles noting the growing trend of restaurant-distilleries selling packaged spirits under the same name or brand as the restaurant portion of the business. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm by Jeff Gittins
Jones, in which the Court held that the State Engineer could not consider alleged forfeiture in determining whether or not to grant a change application. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
Grace is a happily married patent attorney with an abandoned patent application. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Robert A. Epstein
  Judge Jones held as follows: While the amended alimony law does not set a specific minimum or maximum time period for obtaining an advance ruling on a prospective retirement and its effect upon an existing support obligation, Judge Jones concluded that the statute contemplates that the prospective retirement will take effect “within reasonable proximity” to the application itself, rather than several years in advance. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:45 am by Chris Jaglowitz
The one that was most applicable to this case was the tort of “intrusion upon seclusion. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 6:52 pm by Arkansas Employment Law Letter
Steve Jones is a partner with Jack Nelson Jones & Bryant, P.A., practicing in the firm’s Little Rock, Arkansas, office. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:18 am
Jones did the things they allege with the intent to intimidate the witness who was testifying, it would certainly be an application of the statute that is very consistent with the original intent of the law. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm by Paul Ohm
" By direct application of these cases, the warrantless tracking in Jones seems constitutional, because it was restricted to movement on public, city streets. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:06 pm by Paul Ohm
" By direct application of these cases, the warrantless tracking in Jones seems constitutional, because it was restricted to movement on public, city streets. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:17 pm
The following commentary is by Bonnie Scott Jones, a senior attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:41 pm by Tung Yin
A legal writing applicant's lawsuit against my former employer, the University of Iowa College of Law, made quite a splash over a year ago, when she alleged that she had not been hired for a Legal Analysis, Writing, and Research instructor position due to political bias. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:38 pm by WIMS
Jones said, "We analyzed a number of major alternative routes, I think about 14. [read post]