Search for: "Art Technology Group, Inc."
Results 501 - 520
of 774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 1:04 pm
Cannon Avent Group, PLC, 479 F.3d 1313, 1319 (Fed. [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
Morel (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Google – Google asks California judge to declare that it is not liable for copyright infringement, simply by linking to copyright-infringing works on RapidShare (1709 Copyright Blog) Universal Music Group – Amici urge 9th Circuit to reverse UMG v Veoh case; RIAA, NBCU, PROs and WLF weigh in (Copyrights & Campaigns) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court E D Virginia dismisses Rosetta… [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:32 am
" Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
Falls Media, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) TTAB Precedential No 15: TTAB affirms rejection of website specimen for goods, ordering information lacking: In re Quantum Foods, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB enters summary judgment: Applicant lacked bona fide intent to use FEAR TH [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm
Apple Inc. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 8:20 am
” Expected to attend are IP leaders from BP America Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Bose, Brigham Young University, Cornell University, Stanford University, Duke University, Georgetown University, GlaxoSmithKline, Honeywell, Harvard University, Johnson & Johnson, Kauffman Foundation, Lockheed Martin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Mayo Clinic, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals Inc., Rutgers, Syngenta Biotechnology, Scripps Research Institute, U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Increased competition and technological/platform proliferation are placing an enormous strain on traditional media operations and business models. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
See Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 1:39 pm
Hearing Components sued Shure over hearing aid patents 4,880,076; 5,002,151; and 5,401,920, technologies used in Shure's earphones. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 12:31 pm
Their digging turned up significant prior art from several sources: codes from a national standard-setting group created in the late 1990s, bar codes from RPS, the company that later became FedEx Ground, UPS bar code technology, and other earlier patents. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
UnitedHealth Group, Inc (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) US Copyright – Decisions CAFC: The transformative nature of a photograph: Copyright and the Korean War Veterans Memorial: Frank Gaylord v United States (IP Osgoode) 4th Circuit: Fine art paintings from photographs and actual damages for copyright infringement: Hofmann v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
UnitedHealth Group, Inc (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) US Copyright – Decisions CAFC: The transformative nature of a photograph: Copyright and the Korean War Veterans Memorial: Frank Gaylord v United States (IP Osgoode) 4th Circuit: Fine art paintings from photographs and actual damages for copyright infringement: Hofmann v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Even industry groups and manufacturing executives have acknowledged and reluctantly conceded that litigation has enhanced product safety by changing the way they do business. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
Motorola, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:09 am
Motorola, Inc. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 2:10 am
This view was articulated most clearly in Teradyne, Inc. v. 4Tel Technology, D2000-0026 (WIPO May 9, 2000), although raised in the first case decided under the UDRP. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
