Search for: "BATTLES v. STATE"
Results 501 - 520
of 8,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm
Samsung and FTC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Field v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 12:26 pm
The 23-page complaint, Fox Television Stations, Inc. et al v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 6:45 am
(See prior posting and this background.)Now in Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:30 pm
(David Kopel) McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:32 am
Imagine if Schumer had freed red-state Dems to support Gorsuch last year. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:28 am
In the published opinion Doe v Boyle, Docket No. 320102 (September 22, 2015), after a lengthy battle, the Court of Appeals awarded court-appointed guardian ad litem Thomas Woods costs and attorney's fees for his services on a personal injury suit as a guardian ad litem for the defendant minor child. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 6:50 am
Judicial Watch, the government watchdog group, announced today that its client, the Arizona State Legislature, has been granted permission to intervene as a defendant in the Obama Justice Department lawsuit (USA v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm
Round 1 - UMG Recordings Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm
See Bell v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 11:46 am
In Davidson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Short v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
In Short v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 7:43 pm
§ 48 after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Six months later, Blackbeard was killed in battle with British colonial forces on November 22, 1718. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Amicus curiae CalPERS states that it has approximately $190 billion under management, CRI 595 at 2, while amicus curiae CalSTRS states that its portfolio is valued at $135 billion. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
In Kenefick v City of Battle Creek, __ Mich App __ (2009) (approved for publication July 2, 2009), a city ordinance requiring owners of abandoned homes to pay a "monitoring fee" was challenged on grounds that it was both unconstitutionally vague and violated the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm
The judgment in Nandini Sundaram v. [read post]
