Search for: "BEAR v. STATE" Results 501 - 520 of 14,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm by Guest Blogger
No one should be forced to bear significant costs on account of someone else's religious practice. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am by Josh Blackman
In dissent, Justice Breyer contended that “the Government’s arguments do not come close to carrying the heavy burden that the Government bears in seeking such extraordinary relief. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:09 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The Third Circuit has handed down an interesting Second Amendment decision, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
Jones (University of Michigan) has an opinion piece on CNN that brings her historical research to bear on the Supreme Court's recent decision in Schuette v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Hardison, 432 U.S. 63, 84 (1977), which stated that employers suffer an “undue hardship” in accommodating an employee’s religious exercise whenever doing so would require them “to bear more than a de minimis cost,” misinterprets § 2000e(j) and should be overruled. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:54 pm by zshapiro
Besides Alito’s plurality decision in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Amanda L. Tyler
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 7:08 am
While the Constitution is in many ways a beautifully written document, the framers deserve no gold stars when it comes to how they phrased the Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am by Christine Corcos
Roe v Wade established the abortion right as against state criminal prohibitions (1973), followed by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am
Roe v Wade established the abortion right as against state criminal prohibitions (1973), followed by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am by Terry Hart
A taking from another author’s work for the purpose of making points that have no bearing on the original may well be fair use, but the taker would need to show a justification.3Authors Guild v. [read post]