Search for: "BENCH v. STATE"
Results 501 - 520
of 7,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2021, 3:06 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the complaint failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:09 am
The trial judge, in this bench trial, stated the court would not consider the statement as evidence to establish that C.H. was raped. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:32 am
In the most recent Bench & Bar (Minnesota State Bar Journal) article “Boomtown: Risks and Rewards in the Peace Garden State,” Kristin Rowell writes about her experiences in litigating contract claims in both Fort Berthold Tribal Court and North Dakota’s Montrail County District Court where the courts reach opposition conclusions on the same legal question. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:05 pm
But actually this is about 2/6's APJ Gilbert's speaking out in court -- as the plaintiff in his own lawsuit Gilbert v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
RLUIPA is the statute enacted to apply to state prisons and land use following Boerne v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 10:19 pm
Although the Supreme Court in State of Arunachal Pradesh v. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 10:16 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
In Wittman v Personhuballah, 578 U. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 10:17 pm
In this case the Full Bench stated that a number of relevant factors needed to be considered for the purposes of s.389(2) of the Act, but that these factors would vary significantly from case to case. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 10:55 pm
The New Mexico Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 5:19 pm
SEPTA and Schaller v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 3:18 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) C, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2578 (04 November 2010) Qazi & Anor, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2579 (04 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) HHY Luxembourg Sarl & Anr v Barclays Bank Plc & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1248 (22 October 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Eurocall Ltd v Energis Communications Ltd & Anor [2010] EWHC 2790 (QB) (04 November 2010) Jaison Property Development Co Ltd… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:52 am
The judgment was delivered by the special bench of the High Court, consisting of Justices GS Kulkarni and Neela Gokhale, in Shivangi Agarwal & Ors. v. the Union of India & Ors. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For example, the Supreme Court had held that an LPA is maintainable against a judgment given by a single judge under: (a) s. 76(1) of the Trademarks Act, 1940 (National Sewing Thread Co v James Chadwick—a three-judge Bench); (b) s. 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (Vinita Khanolkar v Pai—a two-judge Bench); (c) s. 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (Sharda Devi v State of Bihar—a three-judge Bench); (d) s. 299 of… [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:41 pm
She (and her lawyer) wanted a bench trial, and after a brief colloquy with the trial court, she expressly waived her right to a jury trial. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:49 am
[8] Kartar Singh v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:35 am
The bench had noted that the ordinance was an attempt to overreach the judgement of the SC in Vikas Kishanrao Gawali v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 8:01 am
But in 2011, the court in Harrington v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:14 am
Cyberheat CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM – Hypertouch v. [read post]
