Search for: "BRIDGES v. STATE" Results 501 - 520 of 2,406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It cannot be determined whether the payments constitute marital property, as plaintiff suggests, or whether, as defendant posits, they constitute social security bridge payments, which do not constitute a form of deferred compensation and thus are not marital property (see Olivo v Olivo, 82 NY2d 202, 208). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:33 am
Ct. 842, 694 N.E.2d 381 (1998), review denied (Mass. 1999) and Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:10 am by Jeffrey Kahn
  Justice Brennan, dissenting from the 5-4 opinion in Abel v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis    On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:55 pm by Jon Sands
”Editorial note: This case supports those States that have bridge or open ended sentences, arguably like Arizona’s “open 6. [read post]