Search for: "BRIDGES v. STATE"
Results 501 - 520
of 2,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2011, 2:57 am
It cannot be determined whether the payments constitute marital property, as plaintiff suggests, or whether, as defendant posits, they constitute social security bridge payments, which do not constitute a form of deferred compensation and thus are not marital property (see Olivo v Olivo, 82 NY2d 202, 208). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 9:55 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)He considers ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:31 am
State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 9:00 am
V. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 10:21 am
State of N.J. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:33 am
Ct. 842, 694 N.E.2d 381 (1998), review denied (Mass. 1999) and Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 12:45 pm
In Brnovich v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:43 am
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES V. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:10 am
New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce [v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:55 am
RYBA V. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 12:20 pm
In McCleery v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:06 pm
” State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:10 am
Justice Brennan, dissenting from the 5-4 opinion in Abel v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:21 am
NAVIN V. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:55 pm
”Editorial note: This case supports those States that have bridge or open ended sentences, arguably like Arizona’s “open 6. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 3:06 pm
Ed. 2d 257 (2005) and Gunn v. [read post]