Search for: "Barnes v. Washington"
Results 501 - 520
of 999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2007, 1:26 pm
In the Washington Post, Bill Miller and Robert Barnes have this article; Cary O'Reilly of Bloomberg News reports here; and the ACS Blog has this post on the District Court's ruling in this case. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:55 pm
The Washington Post's Robert Barnes has this news analysis on the decision and what it portends for the Roberts Court. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:32 pm
" Also in the Washington Post is Bob Barnes and David Nakamura's report on today's filing, here. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:46 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes looks at the “blockbuster question” the Supreme Court will consider “at the start of its new term: Is it legal to fire someone for being gay or transgender? [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:21 am
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Bill Mears of CNN, Bob Barnes of the Washington Post, Bob Egelko of the San Francisco Chronicle, Joan Biskupic of USA Today, and Mark Sherman of the Associated Press (via the Washington Post) all predict that a majority of the Court will uphold the court order requiring California to reduce its prison population by some 40,000 inmates. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am
Briefly: The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes reports that the Justices have become “fodder for late-night comedians,” an unsurprising development given that the Court “will decide a series of cases this year—including the constitutionality of the health-care overhaul—as important as any the Justices have faced in years. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:53 am
” Other coverage comes from Richard Wolf of USA Today and Robert Barnes of The Washington Post. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Donald Clarke looks at Animal Science Products v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
At the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse blog, Richard Samp writes that although “[t]he Supreme Court took a step in the right direction [last] week when it held [in Comcast v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:10 pm
Additional coverage of the case comes from Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times (via the San Francisco Chronicle), CNN, and Courthouse News Service. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am
Additional coverage of the three grants comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:55 am
” Briefly: For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that, “[t]o a far greater degree than its predecessors, the Trump administration has sought to bypass adverse lower-court rulings on some of its signature issues by seeking extraordinary relief from a refortified conservative Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The first was Christie v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
” For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a solo dissent to the ruling, accusing his colleagues of “turning the Second Amendment into a ‘disfavored right. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am
I’m not sure what the 9th Circuit has against Section 230: Roommates; Barnes v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
Additional coverage of the grant in Microsoft comes from Mark Sherman at the Associated Press, Greg Stohr at Bloomberg, Lawrence Hurley at Reuters, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Adam Liptak for The New York Times, Brent Kendall for The Wall Street Journal, and Josh Gerstein at Politico, who reports that “[l]aw enforcement officials say they need the ability to compel U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:57 am
Yesterday, Robert Barnes and Amy Goldstein at the Washington Post and Joan Biskupic at USA Today reported on the conclusion of Kagan’s remarks. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
In Maryland v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
Joan Biskupic of the USA Today, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, and David Savage of the Chicago Tribune all covered the oral argument in Williams; additional coverage comes from Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post – who reports that Justice Kennedy “seemed to abandon his concerns” about the Court’s current Confrontation Clause jurisprudence – and Jonathan Arogeti at ACSblog. [read post]
