Search for: "Bates v. Bates" Results 501 - 520 of 980
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am by Micah Buchdahl
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 8:25 am
The specific New York law prohibiting such discrimination is Executive Law § 296(1)(a) which provides in part:It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer * * * because of the disability * * * of any individual, to refuse to hire or employ or to bar or to discharge from employment such individual or to discriminate against such individual in compensation or in terms, conditions or privileges of employment.It is not easy to recover on an action commenced under… [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am by Micah Buchdahl
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:12 am by Larry Bodine
The ABA’s proposed actions will cause a chilling effect on a lawyer’s right to commercial free speech, first established In Bates v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 5:56 am
A class of hearing impaired applicants challenged these standards under the ADA.The Ninth Circuit, in Bates v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:32 am by azatty
“The state that begat lawyer advertising (remember Bates v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
” A Daily Journal podcast features a discussion of this term’s second partisan-gerrymandering case, Benisek v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 10:12 am by Larry Bodine
The ABA’s proposed actions will cause a chilling effect on a lawyer’s right to commercial free speech, first established In Bates v. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 3:28 pm
WV&Z waits with bated breath for that case to commence. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
Under a 1971 Supreme Court decision, Bivens v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:11 am by CMS
All parties concerned will no doubt be awaiting the Supreme Court’s judgment with bated breath. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am by INFORRM
Media lawyers have been waiting with bated breath for judicial interpretation of the 2013 Act; in particular Section 1(1). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
At Take Care, Brianne Gorod argues that the oral argument in Janus v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Counting to 5 (podcast) looks at the opinion in Hall v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 9:31 pm
" Taylor v Farrugia [2009] NSWSC 801 (5 June 2009) Related posts:Ontario: Jurisdiction and Family Law In Okmyansky v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm by Jani
Having discussed the Aereo saga quite extensively through its litigation life cycle (speculation on the Supreme Court decision can be found here, discussion on the District Court decision here), this writer for one bated his breath waiting for the US Supreme Court decision on the case. [read post]