Search for: "Benning v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
You’ll recall that the three-judge panel in Hamdan v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
Perry v Truefitt, 49 ER 749 stated that ‘A man is not to sell his own goods under pretence that they are the goods of another man. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on the focus on the views of Senator Ben Nelson, the now-retired Democrat from Nebraska who, during the debate over the Affordable Care Act, “insisted that states take the lead in establishing the exchanges” where individuals could purchase health insurance. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
The final gift under the relist tree is a handwritten pro se petition, Ben-Levi v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 6:37 am
In the Ben action, filed on December 15, 2014, there are 27 plaintiffs from 14 different states. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s Wayfair v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:34 am
The district court held that although the state court had not complied with either state law or the requirements imposed by the Court's 1986 decision in Ford v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:37 pm
V(1)(d) of the New York Convention. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:06 am
Daphne Keller explained how the Adalah v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 1:36 pm
The technicians filed FLSA collective-action lawsuits against DirecTV in courts across the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 1:36 pm
The technicians filed FLSA collective-action lawsuits against DirecTV in courts across the United States. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:22 pm
Ben Golant, the Copyright Office’s assistant general counsel, asked whether AT&T, the exclusive provider for the iPhone in the United States, “prohibits you from implementing certain applications? [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:54 am
Perhaps both sides over-state their case. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:15 am
The effect of the CJEU's decision was that claimants can potentially obtain pan-EU relief against multiple connected defendants located in different Member States, provided that there is an 'anchor' defendant sued in its Member State of domicile.The complexities of the jurisdiction issues raised in Nintendo have been further highlighted in a recent reference by the Court of Appeal to the CJEU in AMS Neve Ltd & Ors v Heritage Audio S.L. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 9:31 am
Rejecting the argument that the judge’s order was contrary to federal public policy, the court noted that the Department of Justice has recently offered “equivocal statements” about state laws allowing marijuana use for medical and even recreational purposes, and has even informed the governors of two states that voted to legalize possession of the drug and regulate its production and distribution that it would defer its right to challenge those laws (Vialpando… [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 7:30 am
[and] ensure[ ] that the labeling ban will fail to achieve that end"); City of Cincinnati v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:28 am
E.g., Newton v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
First, and doctrinally, there’s the “immediate custodian” rule articulated by the Supreme Court in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
In response to Scott Dodson’s piece on Bowles v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps weighs in on Carpenter v. [read post]
