Search for: "Bird v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 7:20 am
Indeed, the Court in Comcast cited to United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:46 am
(IPKat) United States US General Interview with White House ‘IP Czar’, Victoria Espinel (PatLit) When a school boy’s trick meets strangers in a train (or in the Air) – trade secrets and strangers: E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v Christopher (IPKat) USPTO invites comments on strategic plan (IP Watch) (USPTO) US Patent Reform Unreasonable patent applicant delay and the USPTO backlog (Patently-O) US Patents June IP Update podcast: Bilski, Edwards,… [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 6:18 pm
SUMMARY: On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (D.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 3:57 am
Despite public outcry, and the urging of physicians, asbestos is still not banned in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:32 am
” Given that vast land areas of the United States are part of the migratory bird flyways, the court’s opinion paves the way for all of these areas to become critical habitat for listed species. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 4:25 pm
” These names are associated with its Ravenswood Winery label that produces a large volume of wine in the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Bird and Lucille M. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
Is it a bird? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
Desmarais is also registered to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:16 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:57 pm
KIUC is charged with nine counts each of taking threatened species in violation of 16 USC §§ 1538(a)(1)(G) and 1540(b)(1) and Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, § 17.31(c) and (a); and taking migratory birds in violation of 16 USC §§ 703(a), 707(a).I haven't had time to do more than scan it and I'm no expert at environmental law - especially endangered species (we'll learn about it together as the case progresses) - but I notice that many of the… [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:12 am
Florida United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
Click Here Cory King settles with state on feedlot charges. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
Especially when to stay with the two in the bush involves sacrificing many birds in hand. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
