Search for: "Booker v. Booker"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2010, 8:32 am
Judge Booker takes issue with Miller and Jones. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 6:14 am
The 9th does remand though under Ameline in light of Booker's advisory Guidelines holding.U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2006, 4:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:57 am
" Williams v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 7:27 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:05 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:06 am
The Second Circuit today in US v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 11:02 am
Many individuals mistakenly believe that the United States Supreme Court's 2007 decision in Kimbrough v United States, 128 S. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:54 pm
US v. [read post]
Appellate Remand that Requires Solely Ministerial Act by District Court Does Not Toll Finality Clock
19 Oct 2006, 9:34 am
Stanley Burrell v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 5:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 4:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:13 am
But we do it in the judiciary all the time.For example, ever since the Supreme Court in Booker held that the sentencing guidelines were advisory, the Ninth Circuit has conducted what we call "limited Ameline" remands, in which the district court is basically asked whether -- for those cases that were on appeal when Booker was decided -- it would have imposed the same sentence had it known the guidelines were advisory. [read post]
20 Aug 2005, 1:18 pm
Upon checking the docket for United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 1:29 pm
US v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 1:14 pm
Booker is unsurprisingly bombastic. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 4:08 pm
Booker, 72 M.J. 787 (N.M. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 7:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 7:34 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
