Search for: "Briggs" Results 501 - 520 of 1,223
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
Agado, 964 P.2d 565, 569 (Colorado Court of Appeals 1998) (Briggs, J., specially concurring), and citing several other cases). [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:07 pm
 Despite this clear authority, SDOG, represented by BLC [the Briggs Law Corporation], filed an answer in the Validation Action. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:12 am
 As readers know, this point is not of secondary importance: for instance, in the UK, it has prompted the dissent of Briggs LJ in the recent Court of Appeal judgment in Cartier [here].Tobias Mc FaddenBackgroundThis reference for a preliminary ruling was made in the context of proceedings between Sony and a person (Tobias Mc Fadden) who operates a business selling and renting lighting and sound systems for various events.Mc Fadden owns a Wi-Fi connection… [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 12:36 pm by Edward Smith
West Modesto Structure Fire West Modesto Structure Fire I’m Ed Smith, a Modesto personal injury attorney. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
” The Canadian initiative closely parallels a study of online courts conducted in the UK under the aegis of Lord Justice Briggs. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
As to some broader points of principle, the chair Darren Meale offered up for discussion the suggestion that the Cartier outcome that has the ISPs bearing the costs of implementing a blocking order does not sit comfortably with the fact that they are supposed to enjoy the privilege of a safe harbour when remaining passive in transmitting information, or with explicit recognition that they are not wrongdoers in these cases, the latter being the thrust of Briggs LJ’s dissent… [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 5:13 am
In his dissent Briggs LJ stated to agree with the analysis of Kitchin LJ, except on the issue of costs. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:49 pm by Giles Peaker
Lord Justice Briggs’ final Review of the Civil Court Structure has been published. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 4:10 pm by familoo
I suppose if all of that leaves you still at a loose end, wondering about your poolside summer read, you could always read the Briggs Review Final Report (out today) or the Bar Council response to the interim report…And no, I don’t have the time or the stomach to read it and precis it for you in a blog. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Sacramento District Attorney Anne Marie Schubert has this op-ed in the Sacramento Bee, responding to an earlier piece by Ron Briggs. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:20 am by Jani Ihalainen
The Court ultimately disallowed the appeal and sustained the order.The decision was by no means without its issues, and one primary concern was raised by Lord Justice Briggs on costs. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 2:47 am by Tim Kevan
It is based on the psychological tests by Katharine Cook Briggs and […] [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 1:54 am by INFORRM
On this one issue alone, Briggs LJ gave a short dissenting judgment saying that the costs should be met by the claimants. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
The Court upheld the "entirely correct" [para 35] decision of Arnold J, thus confirming that injunctions against intermediaries can be sought also in IP cases other than copyright [this is a huge relief for rightholders, also in the aftermath of Brexit, ie at a time when it is unclear what relevance EU legislation - especially the bits not expressly transposed into UK law - will eventually have in this country].Kitchin LJ delivered the judgment (with which… [read post]
21 May 2016, 7:58 am by Idaho State Police
The fourth vehicle, a 2009 Chevrolet pickup, driven by Christopher Briggs, 50 of Rigby, received damage from debris at the crash scene. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:37 pm by Idaho State Police
The fourth vehicle, a 2009 Chevrolet pickup, driven by Christopher Briggs, 50 of Rigby, received damage from debris at the crash scene. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
CMS Cameron McKenna’s Rob Briggs discusses recent developments here. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:46 am
This year's motion was "This House believes that Online Courts are the Future for Intellectual Property Disputes", inspired by Lord Justice Briggs' recent Civil Courts Structure Review. [read post]