Search for: "Bush v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 4,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2024, 12:56 am
Bush, George W. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:10 am
Bush commuted his sentence to life in prison and stated that as a death penalty supporter, “I feel a special obligation to make sure the State of Texas never executes a person for a crime they may not have committed. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 6:00 am
Of possible tangential value to embassies and consulates is the United States District Court for the District of Columbia decision of September 19, 2007 in the matter Menachem Binyamin Zivitofsky et al. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm
” Citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:02 am
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 5:53 pm
The case is Wilson v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 7:00 am
Levine V. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:37 pm
United States and Nelson v. [read post]
9 May 2008, 5:18 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:44 am
State of Texas v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 1:51 pm
Bush). [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:10 am
A federal judge threw out the case after the Bush Administration invoked the “state serets privilege. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:17 pm
The government opposition brief, filed Monday in Plame Wilson, et al., v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:45 pm
Circuit, the woman who was too extreme for Presidnent Bush to nominate for the Supreme Court (and that's saying something).From K&R Limited Partnership v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:02 am
Bush, which allows Guantanamo Bay detainees to file habeas corpus petitions, also gives Bagram detainees access to United States courts. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, decided shortly before Bush v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 9:02 am
, this month marks the anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 6:07 am
* David Boies thinks the Supreme Court doesn't want a Bush v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Bush (2004), which gave Guantanamo prisoners the right to challenge their detention in federal court, and in Munaf v. [read post]
