Search for: "Butts v. THE STATE" Results 501 - 520 of 659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:25 am
In a states' rights oriented decision, United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
China considered sold ‘within the United States’ for infringement purposes: SEB S.A. v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Law Journal reports that a libel claim filed [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:05 am by SOIssues
And when it comes back and bites you in the butt, don't go screaming the laws are unfair. 05/10/2010 By J.L. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
In fact, I can state the unequivocal belief that that day would absolutely never come. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
County of Butte (March 23, 2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 550, the California Court of Appeal for the Third District reaffirmed the rule established in Locklin v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Ginsburg has authored notable majority opinions, including United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 9:16 am
   The Commission also noted that the NYPD Blue episode was not coded by the network as containing sexual material, so a V-Chip would not have blocked the bare butt that formed the basis of the indecency finding.In both cases, the Commission rejected claims that the affiliates should not be responsible for the content broadcast on the network programming. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
Since September 2021, anyone arrested for violation of  Texas Penal Code §43.021 is facing charges of a either state jail felony or felonies of either the 2nd or 3rd degree, as compared to misdemeanor charges in other states. [read post]