Search for: "C T CORPORATION" Results 501 - 520 of 7,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2010, 6:30 pm by Erin Miller
AT&T, challenges whether corporations have a right to privacy for the purposes of the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:23 am by Ron
A January 2013 Corporate Counsel article explores the potential of data modeling to support compliance with the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 4:41 am
From Arbitrary and Capricious:A&C reader Mike sent this link to an article in the January 2007 edition of Governing Magazine:Rights of Defense - Poor people still don't get fair treatment in criminal court. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:00 am by Sean Hanover
Technically, this applies to C corporations, also, however, handling partnerships may be a little different -- so chat with us first). [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:40 am by Donald Oder
Whatever the reason, the choice of a C-Corporation for small businesses isn't inherently a bad one. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:33 pm
I'd like to see that mandated as a condition for a bylaw to be valid, so that it's clear that the bylaw can't be used in a control contest. c. [read post]
With Messi (see cases C-449/18P and C-474/18P MESSI)  and Miley Cyrus (case T‑368/20 MILEY CYRUS), we learnt that reputation or renown of (personal) names is a factor which should be taken in consideration when comparing marks and which may ultimately exclude confusion with an earlier similar mark. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:24 am by Christine Hurt
Because I'm teaching Corporate Tax this semester, I'm probably poring over the "How Much Tax Does Romney Pay? [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
If there are accumulated C corporation e&p, remembering what the accumulated adjustments account is will serve students well. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 9:30 am
And what's "reasonable" depends on whether that owner is an employee of a C-corporation or an S-corporation. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:00 am by Heidi Meinzer
PHH’s second argument was that it fell under an exception found in Section 203.604 (c), that a face-to-face meeting is not required … if [t]he mortgaged property is not within 200 miles of the mortgagee, its servicer, or a branch office of either. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 8:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
’ ” But the National Grange didn’t show falsity for those statements. [read post]
A Newly Emerging C-Level Role Successful, multi-billion-dollar corporations don’t create highly paid C-level roles on a whim. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
It sounds like they don’t appreciate the virtues of crony capitalism, otherwise known as “The Chicago Way”. [read post]