Search for: "CALIFORNIANS v. CALIFORNIA"
Results 501 - 520
of 591
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm
By 8-1, the Court mowed down an effort by the Supreme Court of California to hale a drug-maker into a San Francisco trial court over harm that its Plavix product may have caused to non-Californians. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:46 am
Certainly Sherwood Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
California Teachers Association). [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:05 pm
Californians live in one of 23 states that have their own non-discrimination protections (under the California Fair Housing and Employment Act). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will determine the validity of the EU Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) (Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillan Schrems) whilst the General Court of the EU will consider the future of Privacy Shield (La Quadrature du Net v Commission). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will determine the validity of the EU Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) (Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillan Schrems) whilst the General Court of the EU will consider the future of Privacy Shield (La Quadrature du Net v Commission). [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
" The petitioners rely heavily on a 1990 California Supreme Court decision, Raven v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:34 am
" Probably one of the best known cases on the matter was litigation pursued in the Californian courts against both Sirius and Pandora by Flo & Eddie, former members of 1960s band The Turtles and whilst a settlement was reached in California, and new law removes any debate over the ongoing royalty obligations of services like Pandora moving forward, the question remained over what royalties should have been paid in the past. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:30 am
By Rebecca Tushnet and Eric GoldmanTrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 6:59 am
J.G. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
A coalition argued the law ignored the growing trend and choice of Californians to work independently. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 3:33 am
So if California didn’t want Mejia (or, if he wasn’t, in fact, released because of Brown v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Yesterday the 9th Circuit issued its decision striking down California’s CASE (Californians Against Sexual Exploitation) Act as violative of the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 1:52 pm
According to CNET at least two class actions have already been filed in the Californian courts, including one (Thomson v. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 9:31 am
TCL v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:16 am
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/12-years-a-slave-draws-767183 and http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showbiz/bizonsunday/6294030/Sam-Smith-settles-up-royalty-dispute-with-Tom-Petty-and-Jeff-Lynne.html and for more on the UK's position on 'casual connection see Francis Day & Hunter v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am
The Privacy Lives blog discusses the Californian case of Catsouras v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:07 pm
And of course, the law only covers Californians. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:13 am
ACLU says California DNA law violates privacy [San Francisco Chronicle] Haskell v. [read post]
