Search for: "CAMPBELL v CAMPBELL" Results 501 - 520 of 3,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2020, 5:50 am
Jane Lambert Court of Appeal (Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold and Lady Justice Nichola Davies) Genentech Inc v Comptroller and Master Data Center v Comptroller [2020] EWCA Civ 475 (31 March 2020) These were appeals from the decision of Mr Recorder Campbell QC in Master Data Center, Inc v Comptroller [2020] EWHC 572 (Pat) (11 March 2020) which I blogged in Supplementary Protection [read post]
The California Supreme Court expressly rejected the Ninth Circuit’s “narrow restraint” exception to section 16600 espoused in Campbell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:38 am by Rose Hughes
The Judge (Recorder Douglas Campbell QC) found that the UK IPO were in fact “properly open” to allow applicants to shorten their SPC term. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 12:28 pm by Jason Rantanen
Lucas Osborn, Campbell University School of Law. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 9:13 am
  Photo showing intermediate age-related macular degeneration Author US National Eye Institute Source Wikipedia Macular Degeneration  Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Recorder Campbell) Master Data Center, Inc v Comptroller  [2020] EWHC 572 (Pat) (11 March 2020) A supplementary protection certificate ("SPC") is an intellectual property right ("IPR") that protects the active ingredients [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm by HSnader
Dunkin’ Donuts IHOP Bridgestone DuPont IKEA Buffalo Wild Wings Duracell ln-N-Out Burger Campbell’s Soup Eddie V’s International Paper Carl’s Jr. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Medical information would almost certainly pass this threshold (see: Campbell v MGN). [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Campbell: classic one-off transformative use adding new meaning, expression, or meaning. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:27 am by Eugene Volokh
The Feb. 3, 2020 decisions seem to follow well from the logic of the Supreme Court's 1994 Pretty Woman case (Campbell v. [read post]