Search for: "COPE v. COPE" Results 501 - 520 of 1,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2011, 11:24 am by Peter Tillers
Cope, 527 F.3d 944 n. 1 (9th Cir. 2008): As we explained in detail in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:08 pm by Joanna Vincent
The first of the mitigating factors raised by Mr Clayton was his consumption of the drug to assist him to cope with work-related stress and to sleep.[6] Whilst this factor was relevant, it had to be assessed in the context of Coles’ drug and alcohol policy, which encouraged self-reporting without sanction.[7] Commissioner Hampton did warn that:[8] There are potential dangers for an employer in providing information about detection periods to the extent that this information might… [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:52 pm by Giles Peaker
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223). [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Yuanyou (Sunny) Yang
Regulatory language has yet to be published, leaving a lot of uncertainties, particularly for small businesses as the country is still coping with the massive impact of COVID-19. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:26 pm
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued its decision in the Perfect 10 v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Since then, there is this example of critically important mobile phone tower tracking evidence that was the basis of a conviction for second degree murder at a first trial, later found to be faulty before the re-trial: R. v. [read post]