Search for: "California v. EPA"
Results 501 - 520
of 684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2011, 2:39 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:02 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).During oral arguments in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:22 am
True, EPA has authority to curb carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act, as the Supreme Court recognized in Massachusetts v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:16 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the court that hears appeals in regulatory taking and inverse condemnation cases against the federal government) held the EPA's installation of a log boom on a navigable waterway in California's central valley was not a taking even though it cut off the plaintiffs' riparian access. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
Overturn the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision, in Massachusetts v EPA, holding that greenhouse gases (GHGs) constitute “air pollution” within the meaning of the Clean Air Act and that EPA has the duty to regulate it if the agency finds that GHG emissions endanger health and welfare; . [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:32 pm
In order to meet statutory and regulatory requirements, California submitted a state implementation plan (SIP) to the EPA for its approval. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:54 pm
1940 Chevrolet Dump Truck, Redwood City, CA The California Dump Truck Owners Association (“CDTOA”) filed suit in February 2011 against the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”). [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:45 am
American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
At the Law Offices of James V. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:16 am
Appellant did not demonstrate that it was inconsistent with federal authority or EPA guidance. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:56 am
Lofts, Steve Lowry, Gregory V. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:53 am
In Barnum Timber v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:35 pm
The discussion draft overturns the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 9:43 am
Wilderness Society v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 2:53 pm
EPA could not set future carbon standards and could not allow California to do so. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:17 pm
Other lawsuits have followed, including Center for Biological Diversity v.Johnson (filed 2002, stipulated injunction entered October 2006 requiring EPA to make effects determinations and enter consultation, as appropriate, on the impact of 66 pesticide active ingredients on California red-legged frogs and critical habitat), Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:18 pm
EPA should have ordered California to submit a revised attainment plan for the South Coast after it disapproved the 2003 Attainment Plan. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 1:13 pm
US EPA- California Wilderness Coalition v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Envt'l Protection Agency, No. 09-71414 (Feb. 2, 2011) The case involves whether the EPA properly approved revisions to California's State Implementation Plan for meeting air quality standards for ozone under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
It takes away California’s and other states’ historic authority to clean up carbon pollution from cars, by revoking the California waiver, and barring EPA from issuing any future waivers. [read post]
