Search for: "California v. Russell"
Results 501 - 520
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2013, 7:49 am
Disclosures: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, served as co-counsel to the petitioners in City of Arlington v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 12:52 pm
Arzoumanian v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 7:48 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., then known as Thomas C. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
Last up, out of the California Court of Appeals, is Fernandez v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:17 am
With the Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog notes that with the Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am
Zammit, University of Malta (Malta) II.C Colonial and Postcolonial Legacy · Migration Policies and Legal Transplant in the Mediterranean Area: Control Strategies between Colonialism and Post-Colonialism, Eliana Augusti, University of Salento (Italy) · The Diffusion of Legal Culture in the Colonial and Post-Colonial Context: Two Israeli… [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:30 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am
Also for this blog, Kevin Russell reviews Wednesday’s oral argument in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
On Thursday morning, the Illinois Supreme Court filed its decision in Russell v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
“Absolutely; it shouldn’t be eligible for the Mark [of USDA inspection] – ought to be treated the same as lungs,” wrote one agency veterinarian based in California. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am
Perry and United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 12:10 pm
Jonathan Litman- requires pro bono service prior to the bar makes life difficult for students but is a good policy ; California takes lead on Civil Gideon. 10:53- 3 good arguments for expanding civil gideon: 1) we will all save money if other people get counsel 2) protecting rule of law is good for business and consumers 3) strengthen our own best selves. 10:54- Justice is JUST – US 10:55- Panel 1: Russell Engler, Rebecca Sandefur, Mark… [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 4:41 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:47 am
Perry, the case involving a challenge to California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage, or United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 1:40 pm
Dec. 12, 2011); Russell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:29 am
Perry, in which it argues that California’s Proposition 8 banning same-sex marriage violates the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
