Search for: "California v. Superior Court"
Results 501 - 520
of 5,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2017, 9:38 am
In Doe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:52 pm
Additional Resources: Goonewardene v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:42 pm
California Air Resources Board, et al., San Francisco County Superior Court Case No. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Rosen (Alameda County Superior Court on writ to California Court of Appeal to review the trial court's denial of the demurrers) 5. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:21 pm
The California Supreme Court today decided Barnett v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:56 pm
Superior Court (Hohnbaum), No. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 10:19 am
Superior Court (October 29, 2012), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) granted a petition for a writ filed by See's Candy after the trial court granted summary adjudication in favor of the plaintiff as to four affirmative defenses asserted in the case. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:36 am
The California Supreme Court has issued its opinion in Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 7:34 am
Superior Court (1995) 10 Cal.4th 1185); sellers of used products (Wilkinson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court (ARCO), no. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 2:45 pm
Superior Court ex rel Krescent, S199384 (Cal. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
The California superior court barred the public entities from compensating their private counsel through contingency fees. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 9:37 am
Superior Court case — November 8, 2011. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:40 pm
Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, granted plaintiff's writ petition challenging the trial court's grant of summary adjudication on the plaintiff's punitive damages claim. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 443, remains good law after AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:03 am
KirbyMore than three long years ago, the California Supreme Court granted review in a key employment case with the potential to drastically affect nearly all California employers. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:29 am
And without staying that order for 30 days as required by California law.The Court of Appeal grants a peremptory writ and reverses. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
A Riverside County Superior Court judge ruled that there was no legal requirement to analyze greenhouse gases (GHGs) and global warming impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Highland Springs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:26 am
Superior Court. [read post]
Binding Effect of PAGA Decisions Is An Alternative To Class Certification -- Arias v. Superior Court
30 Jun 2009, 10:08 am
The California Supreme opinion in Arias v. [read post]
