Search for: "Cameron v. Cameron" Results 501 - 520 of 1,350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2015, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
On the same day the trial in Ali-Khan v Galloway MP was fixed. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 12:00 pm by INFORRM
The decision in relation to the Mirror Group came as a surprise to many observers as the company had made wide ranging admissions of phone hacking in a civil trial in March 2015 (see Gulati v MGN Limited [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch)). [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm by Elina Saxena
” The comment has sparked outcry from across the world, including from both British Prime Minister David Cameron and his French counterpart Manuel Valls. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm by Elina Saxena
Assad also rebuked British Prime Minister David Cameron’s assertion that there were 70,000 moderate opposition fighters in Syria who would enable a political solution to the civil war and who retake territory from jihadist forces. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
Adopted a week after the attacks in Paris, the resolution appears to provide grounds for military action and use of force against the Islamic State as Prime Minister David Cameron suggests, but its failure to invoke Chapter 7 explicitly raised questions among Labour opposition leader Jeremy Corbyn. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” Hollande met with British Prime Minister David Cameron yesterday and will travel to Moscow after meeting with President Obama. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” While Britain’s euro-skeptics have suggested that Cameron’s proposal is soft on the issues, others are skeptical that Europe could make the proposed reforms. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 11:19 am by Timothy Edgar
Although it is a close call, the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Schrems v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
Prime Minister David Cameron had previously stated that it was “more likely than not” that a terrorist attack was responsible for the disaster. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 12:15 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
As investigations into the incident continue, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is in London to meet British Prime Minister David Cameron. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
 David Cameron has said that whilst “sputtering over his cornflakes” he decided to legislate to implement filters for adult content. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 1:50 pm by Dale Carpenter
(Much of the history I recount here  comes from Chapter 3 of my book, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 8:28 am by John Jascob
The appeals panel turned away Bebo in August while just days ago SEC ALJ Cameron Elliot imposed a $4.2 million civil penalty on Bebo in a ruling that also rejected her Article II claim as “meritless” and her due process and equal protection arguments as unpersuasive (Bebo v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 2:20 pm by Timothy Edgar
 Cameron Kerry, former general counsel of the US Department of Commerce, notes the robust oversight mechanisms that apply to the US intelligence community. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:42 am by Alex Loomis
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) invalidated the Safe Harbor Framework today in Schrems v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:05 am by John Jascob
A federal judge previously halted the SEC’s in-house proceeding against Duka, but the agency’s appeal of that decision is still pending in the Second Circuit (Duka v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am by Dave
 Thus, Art 7(3) is not exhaustive in its list of the extension of the category of worker: St Prix v SSWP  C-507/12. [read post]