Search for: "Case v. Brown" Results 501 - 520 of 10,926
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
Sure, aside from constitutional issues in the USA, highest courts on statutory issues can be reversed by legislatures, but that is rare, and in the case of the EU hardly practical. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
Former Obama administration acting Solicitor General Neil Katyal actually declared that the indictment “is up there with Dred Scott, it is up there with Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
Precedent for how such exclusive jurisdiction agreements can be treated can be found in the case law following the Ingmar decision of the CJEU. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Operating Auth. posted on the Internet at https://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_03893.htm and In the Matter of the Claim of Tracey Brown, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Operating Auth. posted on the Internet at https://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2023/2023_03893.htm and In the Matter of the Claim of Tracey Brown, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 11:39 am by Nicholas Totin
Supreme Court justices heard the challenges to race-conscious admissions during October of 2023 in two cases: Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm by Kevin
And, you might also be asking, why is this a federal case when they broke state law? [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Browning of Spencer Fane LLP, it appears that at least the "Argument" portion of the brief may have been prepared by artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Because this is an arms ban case, the court should have applied the common-use test required by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm by Bona Law PC
New Classic CasesBrown Shoe One of the most important classic antitrust case is Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Entrenchment or Extension of Dominance The draft Merger Guidelines resurrected a theory of anticompetitive harm largely seen in cases in the 1960s and 1970s—entrenchment or extension of a dominant position. [read post]