Search for: "Castle v. Castle" Results 501 - 520 of 1,002
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Joseph Hilton f/k/a Joseph Yurkin, Pacific Northwestern Energy LLC, Rock Castle Drilling Fund LP, Rock Castle Drilling Fund II LP, and New Horizon Publishing Inc.Case number: 12-cv-81033 (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida)Case filed: September 24, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 20, 2014 04/22/2014 07/21/2014 2014-37 SEC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 12:23 pm by Giles Peaker
Cases pre and post date the Simmons v Castle 10% uplift in general damages (for all claims where damages awarded after 1 April 2013, save for those funded on a CFA signed before 1 April 2013). [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Royal Way of Prague traverses the Staroměstské Náměstí (the Old Town Square), crosses the river at the venerable Karlův Most (Charles Bridge), and then climbs the hill on the river’s left bank to Pražský hrad (the Prague Castle, as depicted in the picture at the top of the post). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:07 am by Michael Balie
Valinor Trading 133 CC t/a Kings Castle v LJ De Jager & Others [2023 ZALCJHB 10 (3 February 2023) [1] Section 191(5)(a) relates to the following types of disputes: if the employee has alleged that the reason for dismissal is related to the employee’s conduct or capacity, or the employee has alleged that the reason for the dismissal is that the employer made the continued employment intolerable or the employer provided the employee with substantially less favourable… [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:54 pm by R. Clark Morrison and Scott Birkey
  Cox Castle was heavily involved in negotiations over the provisions of the State’s new program. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:35 am by Erin Phalon
Cox, Castle & Nicholson Partner Andrew Sabey argued before the Court on behalf of the California Building and Industry Association. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:42 am by Michael
” Giving judgment in Welwyn Hatfield Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Beesley [2010] EWCA Civ 26, Mummery LJ said Beesley told the council he proposed to build a new hay barn on the land, that no change of use was required and provision for sewage disposal was not needed. [read post]
22 May 2009, 2:03 am
Hilarie's analysis focuses on Young v. [read post]