Search for: "Chancellor v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
**Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:37 am
In a scheduling conference on Nov. 7 in the Southwall Technologies litigation, Vice Chancellor J. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:40 pm
" (Ryan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
No. 195]), in which the Vice Chancellor adheres to the New York State court rulings. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:57 am
This question was answered in the negative by the recent decision of Fuchs Family Trust v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:14 am
Selectica, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 1:33 pm
” Indeed, Justice Valihura noted that Vice Chancellor Laster, in an immediate post-trial reaction, stated that “the credibility of the people on the [B]oard” was “very, very strong. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:29 pm
Spiegel v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:39 pm
Background This precise issue was addressed in the recent decision of SolarReserve CSP Holdings LLC v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm
As Chancellor Allen stated long ago, the threat cannot be justified on the grounds that the board knows what is in the best interests of the stockholders. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:58 am
Krishnan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday afternoon, an eleven-judge en banc Ninth Circuit panel heard oral argument in Dukes v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm
Schulman, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Carl is admitted in the State of Delaware and regularly practices before the Delaware Court of Chancery, with an emphasis on shareholder disputes. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 6:14 am
For actions taken by the board, the Court turned to the two-pronged test in Aronson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 2:07 pm
Feeley v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 6:19 am
Vice Chancellor Slights addressed this issue in the opinion of Nguyen v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am
In concluding that the plaintiffs had sufficiently stated a claim on this basis, Vice Chancellor Laster noted that “When Fairhurst engaged in sexual harassment, he was not acting subjectively to further the best interests of the Company. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:11 am
In its June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
