Search for: "Chandler, in Re"
Results 501 - 520
of 594
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2009, 8:48 am
There are still plenty of law firms that have not totally caught on and think if they pay a salary to employees, they're exempt. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 1:23 pm
(Editor’s Note: This post comes to us from Robert S. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 8:43 am
Despite increasing political and media focus on and criticism of risk assessment and risk management efforts by corporate boards, yesterday's In Re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 2:34 pm
In Re Citigroup Inc. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 5:45 am
Second, Richard wondered why many lawyers seem to deny that they're lawyers--that is, to "downplay the legal content of their jobs. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:31 pm
– David Campbell Founder, Saks Fifth Avenue,quoted in 100 Ways to Motivate Others by Steve Chandler and Scott Richardson Will these changes get you to success overnight? [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
It is well documented there are many drivers who, because they're being paid by the mile, will violate federal laws in an effort to make greater profits. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
If we were the Psychology Daily we might suggest something about salving a guilty conscience, but we're the Litigation Daily. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 3:54 pm
” Lastly, a trial available live online in the following matter will be of particular interest to "numbers-crunchers": IN RE: APPRAISAL OF METROMEDIA INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:04 pm
Jessep: You’re damn right I did! [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:18 pm
Adam Chandler has this essay at Slate on cert stage amicus briefs. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Chandler III--[and there's] no doubt the good chancellor thought Judge Lamb had experience with Apollo's corporate machinations," Deal Professor wrote. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:09 am
"Chandler Burr writes perfume reviews. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
Sidhu and In Re Lear Corporation as “reaffirm[ing] the high bar required to prove that directors have breached their duty of loyalty via ‘bad faith conduct’ that cannot be exculpated. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
Sidhu and In Re Lear Corporation as “reaffirm[ing] the high bar required to prove that directors have breached their duty of loyalty via ‘bad faith conduct’ that cannot be exculpated. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:38 am
If you're interested in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion in Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Case in point: In re Seneca Investments, LLC, 2008 WL 4329230 (Del. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Lofton Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0606n.06 Chandler v. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
She also filed a motion for a preliminary injunction ordering Secretary Land to re-examine the recall petitions without applying the challenged state statute. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 10:07 am
And they're loyal to their favorite. [read post]
