Search for: "Change v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 50,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2024, 9:31 am
Then you'd need an en banc court to fix the problem: the very thing that Judges Van Dyke and Miller (rightly) want to avoid.I would think that the better standard would say something like: "Circuit precedent on state law is not binding when there is substantial intervening authority in the state court suggesting that state law on the issue has changed. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 8:22 am
” Aftering making these determinations, the Court articulated the legal consequences for both Israel and other States. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
The situation began to change as the court in Nelson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am
In contrast, the UPC merely requires that the analysis starts from a “realistic starting point”, as succinctly stated in Headnote 3: 3. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Choi at University of Michigan Law School, and Geeyoung Min at Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Or I can move to Florida and try to change it. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm
” On 2 July 2024, some arrived with placards stating: “Jurors have an absolute right to acquit a defendant according to their conscience. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 2:21 pm
Build a system and mechanism to support comprehensive innovation V. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 1:26 am
Saïla Ouald-Chaib, Strasbourg Observers: Mikyas v Belgium: one more ‘headscarf case’ that manifestly fails to acknowledge applicants’ concerns. [read post]
20 Jul 2024, 6:15 am
This is a June 2024, opinion styled, Transamerica Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 3:33 pm
The court reaffirmed the 2002 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Mackin v New Brunswick, which held that the state only has limited immunity. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm
NLRB In Lion Elastomers, LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 10:33 am
Today, EFF is filing an amicus brief in the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am
Richardson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 8:37 am
The court stated that disenfranchised voters should lobby with state legislatures to change the rules in their state constitution rather than seek to change the rules through the judicial system. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 8:16 am
Stiner v. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Consider that in 1924, the year Forster published A Passage to India, with its depiction of how British colonial rule in India distorted human relationships, the Commonwealth of Virginia enacted its Racial Integrity Act (a “modern” version of its centuries old antimiscegenation law), struck down four decades later in Loving v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Bruen and United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
Changing Non-Compete Landscape at the State Level Even if the FTC rule is ultimately enjoined, we remind employers that many state legislatures have implemented laws narrowing the use of non-competition agreements, and others have considered complete legislative bans. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 4:57 pm
By Dennis Crouch In Miller Mendel, Inc. v. [read post]
