Search for: "Childs v. Gross"
Results 501 - 520
of 874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
Unconstitutional to Consider Husband’s Refusal to Give Religious Divorce (Get) When Granting Support
29 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
In Avitzur v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:21 pm
SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. 2nd District.Paternity -- Child custody -- Petition for determination of paternity, parental responsibility, parenting plan, time-sharing schedule, and child support by petitioner, who claims to be biological father of child born during wedlock, seeking to gain custody of child -- Trial court violated due process by entering involuntary dismissal without affording petitioner opportunity to present his full case-in-chief,… [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:21 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:55 am
Finding that the trial court erroneously calculated the amount of income to be imputed to Marla and that it erroneously calculated Timothy's Weekly Gross Income, but finding no other error, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions to (1) recalculate the amount of income to be imputed to Marla; (2) add $100 to Timothy's Weekly Gross Income; and (3) taking (1) and (2) into account, recalculate Timothy's child support obligation. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 5:12 am
You're fat, gross, and ugly. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:04 am
Lee v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:01 am
For example, the credit for adopting a special needs child is a tax incentive. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:54 pm
In Sinclair v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
Allen v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
Boyd v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Polk, No. 072425 Sentence of fifteen years and eight months incarceration for attempting to produce child pornography is affirmed where: 1) there was no gross disproportionality between the fifteen-year mandatory minimum term of imprisonment established by 18 U.S.C. section 2251(e) and the offense of which the defendant was convicted; and 2) the defendant's Eighth Amendment challenge failed. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:47 am
Wickard v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
United States, 11-7928, another child pornography case involving an allegedly defective warrant. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:32 pm
[v] Iowa Code § 91D.1(2). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court Tuesday for arguments on the scope of job discrimination protection in Thompson v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 6:16 am
Lord Justices Pitchford and Gross agreed with Lord Justice Sedley, although for slightly different reasons (see para 68 onwards). [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:28 pm
From Shuman v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:56 am
Specifically, the parties agreed: “No matter defendant’s annual gross income, at no time shall monthly support be lower than $5,000, except after the emancipation of [the parties’ youngest child] when the child support component may be reduced”. [read post]
