Search for: "Cola v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations: aspects of German and… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46) Disruptive innovations: aspects of German and… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:32 pm
As the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts noted in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Technogenia v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:33 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals may have provided trademark owners a little hope in its decision in Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:33 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals may have provided trademark owners a little hope in its decision in Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Becton Dickinson; TiVo v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am
Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
– Need for business and government to understand role of IP (IPEG) Global - Trade Marks / Brands New record for international trade mark registrations in 2008 but signs of slowdown at year end and possible negative annual income (WIPO) (IP Frontline) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Coca-Cola is no longer the world’s most valuable brand (IAM) WTO session tackles details of future register of GI products (Intellectual Property Watch) Can a house mark or… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
Phillips v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:51 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
In the district court, defendant AHRN moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, arguing that plaintiff MRIS did not own the copyrights in the photographs sued upon since the assignments between it and its subscribers were not memorialized in a signed writing as mandated by Section 204(a). [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess, Inc… [read post]
15 May 2020, 3:12 pm
That was enough to state a claim and keep the ADA claims alive. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
Is a product put on the market before the date of filing of a European patent application to be excluded from the state of the art within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC for the sole reason that its composition or internal structure could not be analysed and reproduced without undue burden by the skilled person before that date? [read post]
