Search for: "Collins v. Held"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2010, 8:05 am
Solis v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 am
The seminal case of Delaney v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:23 pm
In Marmet Health Care Center v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:54 am
Collins & Collins, P.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:41 pm
Collins & Collins, P.C. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:16 am
” (per Mr Justice Collins, Holloway v DPP [2004] EWHC 2621 (Admin)). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:33 am
(Knight v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:51 am
Williamson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 6:35 pm
(Wilks v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:36 am
In Zavala v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm
On 16 June 2022, there were hearings in the cases of MBR Acres v others before Nicklin J and GJE v FJV before Collins Rice J. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
Last week in the courts On 6 to 9 June 2023, the trial in the case of LCG v OVD continued before Collins Rice J. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
Last week in the courts On 31 October 2023 Collins Rice J heard an application in the case of Webster v HMRC. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
Patchak and Salazar v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 3:30 pm
Malik v United Kingdom 23780/08 [2012] ECHR 438 (13 March 2012) - Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights held that the suspension of a GP from the Primary Care Trust (PCT) Performers List did not violate his right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions under Article 1 Protocol 1 (A1P1) of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm
" The United States Supreme Court has defined an ex post facto law as one which "punishes as a crime an act previously committed, which was innocent when done, which makes more burdensome the punishment for a crime, after its commission, or which deprives one charged with sex crimes of any defense available according to law at the time when the act was committed as held in Collins v Youngblood and Beazell v Ohio. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 12:12 am
In Clark v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:36 pm
(f) in Doran v Liverpool City Council [2009] EWCA Civ 146, the Court of Appeal had held that any challenge must be to the decision to bring possession proceedings, not to the possession proceedings themselves. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:36 am
See also Hills v. [read post]
