Search for: "Cox v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 1,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2008, 3:41 pm
Noel Cox, The Continuing Question of Sovereignty and the Sovereign Military Order of Jerusalem, Rhodes and MaltaPaul Harpur, Regulating Multi-national Corporations through State-based Laws: Problems with Enforcing Human Rights Torts under the US Alien Tort Statute [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am by Adam Wagner
As Mrs Justice Cox made similar points in the December 2009 incarnation of this dispute (British Airways Plc v Unite the Union [2009] EWHC 3541 (QB) (17 December 2009)), saying that she was bound by that decision and could not therefore go behind it in order to declare that the statutory framework ran contrary to the Human Rights Act. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:20 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  The double-jeopardy issue in the case, the footnote said, was a federal issue that was “finally decided by the highest court in Puerto Rico” and — quoting the Court’s 1975 ruling in Cox Broadcasting v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]