Search for: "Credit v. State"
Results 501 - 520
of 14,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2006, 8:50 am
United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:25 pm
Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
Along with this information, CQC made and submitted representations, which in certain instances were signed by Newcombe himself, that stated the information provided to the Carbon Credit Registry was true, accurate, materially complete, and not false, fraudulent, or misleading. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:59 am
Here is the opinion in Simmonds v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:14 am
Recently, this issue was examined by the court in the case of LH v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm
On December 14th, in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:54 pm
Toni 1 Trust v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:08 am
Gelman v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:32 am
In this post, Alaina Wadsworth and Sophie Newman, who both work within the insurance and reinsurance group at CMS, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court last month in the matter of Aspen Underwriting Ltd and others v Credit Europe Bank NV [2020] UKSC 11. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:38 am
In Bateman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:22 pm
The petition of the day is: Steager v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:00 am
In Duncan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Here is the abstract: Perhaps no decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on “unreasonable search and seizure” has come in for more criticism than Terry v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 12:07 pm
Goldin v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:23 am
Photo credit: tuppus / Foter / CC BY [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:10 am
In addition, said the court, case law supported its conclusion that Jarema credit cannot be awarded to a regular substitute teacher who does not possess a valid New York State teacher's certificate. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
Audry Linton v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 10:29 am
Geier v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 6:31 am
In Harrison v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
You can read the full opinion: Sveen et al v. [read post]
