Search for: "Cross v. Davis"
Results 501 - 520
of 796
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
We must therefore determine whether the statements were "testimonial," because only testimonial statements are subject to the Confrontation Clause (see Davis v Washington, 547 US 813, 821).In Brown (13 NY3d at 336), the report in question contained machine-generated raw data, graphs and charts of a male specimen's DNA characteristics that were isolated from a rape kit. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:45 pm
Louis firm, Bryan Cave, announcing earlier this summer the commencement of its sports law practice group, led by Ryan Davis. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
Sackett v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:16 am
Today in the Community we are discussing the latest in the line of the Court’s Confrontation Clause cases: Williams v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:16 pm
The Government v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
Cross, 11-74 (relisted seven times); Cash v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert In the Oracle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:19 am
United States (2009) and Davis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
The Court also relisted in Davis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm
By Dennis Crouch Typhoon Touch Tech. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
July 23, 2009) (Davis, J.). [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 12:05 pm
King Fourth Amendment: Davis v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
” The two key prior decisions, aside from Crawford itself, were those in Davis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:17 am
On appeal, the Easterby court distinguished its circumstances from that of Kennemur and Jones, stating: The present case differs from Kennemur, Jones and [Bonds v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:17 am
On appeal, the Easterby court distinguished its circumstances from that of Kennemur and Jones, stating: The present case differs from Kennemur, Jones and [Bonds v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In Davis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 8:08 am
In this week’s case (De Sousa v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:38 am
Madigan v. [read post]