Search for: "DAVIS v. STATE" Results 501 - 520 of 6,155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Way to deal with specimen laundering, as in LTTB and in Ohio State’s THE. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 11:07 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
And then, as today, there was debate about the proper legal characterization of those relationships.The United States Supreme Court confronted that debate in McGirt v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of a retainer” (Attallah v Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, LLP, 168 AD3d 1026, 1028 [2d Dept 2019]; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435 [2007]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Newman v City of Tonawanda 2022 NY Slip Op 03834 Decided on June 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Matter of Newman v City of Tonawanda 2022 NY Slip Op 03834 Decided on June 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
  Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On July 12, 2019, defendants, on behalf of plaintiffs, commenced a hybrid Article 78  proceeding captioned Ressler v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is evident, for instance, in the fact that all the Supreme Court's sexual harassment cases have been nonpseudonymous (except Davis as next friend of LaShonda D. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
The court rejects Boule’s argument that a First Amendment retaliation claim is similar to the employment-discrimination claim the court allowed in Davis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]