Search for: "DOES 1-9" Results 501 - 520 of 27,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2024, 8:20 am by Antonios Baris
Read, learn, and enjoy.Details:Published: 2022Format: Hardback, ebookExtent: 220 pages ISBN: 978-0-472-13307-9 (hardback)978-0-472-22025 (ebook)Publisher: University of Michigan Press [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
The judges referred to the Advocate General’s opinion in Coty (case C‑567/18), noting that the term ‘possession’ does not appear in all the language versions of Art. 9(3)(b) EUTMR (the equivalent of Art. 10(3)(b) TMD). [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 7:03 am by centerforartlaw
While the art world does not have specific ESG regulations just yet, the fusion of environmental code, real property law, and tort law within the art space raises potential legal issues that are essential to account for when installing new artwork or growing a visual arts organization. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Our Lady of Victory Hosp., 514 F.3d 217, 226 n.9, the Circuit Court noted that the Second Circuit had recognized that Title VII and NYSHRL discrimination claims are “analytically identical, applying the same standard of proof to both claims”, and that "the reasoning in this section applies to both claims". [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Our Lady of Victory Hosp., 514 F.3d 217, 226 n.9, the Circuit Court noted that the Second Circuit had recognized that Title VII and NYSHRL discrimination claims are “analytically identical, applying the same standard of proof to both claims”, and that "the reasoning in this section applies to both claims". [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
  And though the Court took pains to note its decision “does not mean that corporations cannot leave Delaware,”[2] the decision leaves open questions as to how the Court will determine monetary damages caused by re-domiciling in another jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
  First, a set of Draft Principles were circulated in November 2010.[1]  After a period set aside for public comment and following revision of the text,[2] the SRSG circulated the final version of the UNGP (with an included Official Commentary) in March 2011 annexed to his (final) 2011 SRSG Report,[3] the text of which was substantially revised from the circulated November 2010 Draft. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 11:34 am by Norman L. Eisen
For example, the Court issued three opinions from its October 2019 Term on July 1-2, 2020.) [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:34 am by David Pocklington
My motion does not give details of how the canonical provisions are to be replaced. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:18 am by Jan von Hein
Since they are not essential for safeguarding Belgian fundamental public interests, they are therefore not to be considered as overriding mandatory provisions in the sense of Article 9 para. 1 Rome I Regulation. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
In light of these disagreements, it is worth taking a step back, and exploring the scope of these requirements in some more depth. 1. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And, while there is no existing requirement that firms demonstrate how AI models they use make decisions, the SEC, under current regulatory requirements, needs only to demonstrate that a conflict of interest exists, which it can do from a pattern of investment recommendations or other actions dictated or influenced by AI models, and does not need to show how or why this pattern exists. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Katie Calogero and Daniel Alvarado
The remaining successful protests were post-award victories that fall into categories similar to those we saw at the GAO: (1) improper technical evaluation; (2) inadequate documentation; (3) flawed price analysis. [read post]