Search for: "Dare v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 730
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
Thus, in a stated sensitivity to references that might identify the religion practiced by the religious leader, the majority has dared to step in and regulate the language of prayer—the sacred dialogue between humankind and God. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:00 am
Claim 3, stated to have independent validity, was attacked on grounds of obviousness – it being alleged to lack inventive step over three pieces of prior art (Qin, Lassen and ‘746) and the common general knowledge. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
Like with EU trade mark law (dare the AmeriKat say there is such a thing), a sign that is otherwise common place or generic can acquire distinctiveness through use and be protected by trade mark law. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm by INFORRM
  Well into his stride Tugendhat stated that “no case of public interest had been advanced before herself. [read post]
26 May 2011, 1:28 pm by Justin F. Keith
 I dare say we have not seen the furthest reaches of such state laws as a result of the Court’s decision today. [read post]
22 May 2011, 10:13 pm by Jeff Gamso
  We don't know enough, never will, to be able to eliminate all possible error or even, dare I say, all impossibility.Life, like the universe itself, is far too complex and random. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  You would have realized that “hottest” seems to be a very relative term in the Lone Star State. [read post]