Search for: "David B. Smith" Results 501 - 520 of 962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 9:28 pm by Christopher Zorn
 At Above the Law, David Lat casts his vote for "Selection Effects," "Inter-Generational Privilege," and "A Better Plan B" as the most likely drivers among among BH's explanations. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Lincoln & the Negroes: The Long Road to Equality  (1963) William Rehnquist, Civil Liberty and the Civil War (1997) Similarly, some of the Justices were keenly interested and wrote works on religion and related topics: David J. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Charvet, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, New Orleans LA; David C. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 4:30 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" pjblack.me/wNVV2g a smart, thoughtful piece on facebook from justin erik halldór smith: "Why I Quit Facebook" pjblack.me/zgh2FW just before the super bowl: "Feds in NY shut down 16 sports streaming websites" pjblack.me/xbUQil#lwb486 #lws008 #kkb175 if it won't work for the @nytimes, why will it work for the australian? [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 4:11 am by Rob Robinson
bit.ly/w1LMYO (Thomas Smith, Matthew Collins) NLRB Report Challenges Validity of Many Commonly Used Social Media Policies - bit.ly/xCfcda (Philip Gordon) Obtaining Discovery in China for Use in US Litigation | China Law Insight - bit.ly/yJtH08 (Meg Utterback) Plaintiff Sanctioned for Burning Personal Computer - bit.ly/ykkVqe (K&L Gates) Printing ESI & Scanning It Is Not OK - bit.ly/xryUK2 (Josh Gilliland) Proposed EU Privacy Rules Add to the Burden on International Businesses -… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:12 am by New Books Script
JC 599 U5 S537 2010 The freedoms we lost : consent and resistance in revolutionary America Barbara Clark Smith. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:13 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Josh Smith at Government Executive reports on the filing, as does Kashmir Hill at Forbes. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
And I would not to like to pontificate about what the law is a) it does appear to be unclear and b) in due course as a judge I might be asked to rule on what it is and therefore I can’t express a view to you. [read post]