Search for: "David Kopel" Results 501 - 520 of 555
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by James Bickford
   Briefly:      At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Kopel has an extensive discussion of a recent cert. petition challenging Maryland’s de facto ban on the transportation of handguns. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:17 am by Nabiha Syed
At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Kopel concentrates on the hypothetical “window tax” discussed in the Chief Justice’s opinion, arguing that it is “one more piece of evidence that Chief Justice Roberts was wrong in stating that the individual mandate ‘tax’ is not a direct tax. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am by Marissa Miller
” Finally, at the Volokh Conspiracy, David Kopel argues that the individual mandate cannot be upheld as “a necessary and proper exercise of the power to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:40 am by brian
"   "Earlier this week, David Kopel wrote a historical analysis in Encyclopedia Britannica of the racist origins of marijuana prohibition, which targeted Mexicans in particular. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
David Kopel, also writing for Volokh, previews his own forthcoming piece, which will appear in the December 2009 issue of the Connecticut Law Review. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:49 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court didn't issue an opinion, but Justice David Viviano had an interesting concurrence: The Court today remands to the Court of Appeals an important case concerning the constitutionality of the University of Michigan's prohibition of firearms on campus. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:36 pm by Ken
Edited again: At Volokh Conspiracy, David Kopel has thoughts about the evidence of any anti-Jewish policy and the role of Delta. [read post]
30 May 2013, 10:00 am by Ronald Collins
 The contributors are Orin Kerr, Randy Barnett, David Bernstein, Ilya Somin, Jonathan Adler, and David Kopel; Paul Clement wrote the foreword. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:43 am
Chicago, where David Kopel says the effort is "a superb brief ... worthy of study by law students and anyone else who wants a great example of legal writing that is passionate and forceful, yet also sober and serious. [read post]
19 May 2007, 11:10 am
And David Kopel, who posted at Volokh, had previously written an Issue Backgrounder for the Independence Institute on the same subject. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
There you can find:(1) Josh Blackman arguing that "Clarke is rightly decided" and also contending (although its relevance is not immediately evident), that "the President is not an Officer of the United States;" (2) David Kopel explaining why, in his view, "the Fifth Circuit's Clarke opinion does not go nearly far enough because the Second Amendment properly understood protects a right to duel even outside the rules of the Code… [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:29 am by Jeff Welty
For example, Professor David Kopel argues here that if the Social Security Administration promulgates a regulation that would have the effect of prohibiting gun possession by Social Security beneficiaries who have designated a personal representative to manage their financial affairs, it would be unconstitutional. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
United States, a Tenth Amendment case, drew notice from David Kopel at the Volokh Conspiracy, CBS News, the Christian Science Monitor, and Crime & Consequences. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:21 am by Jeff Welty
Kopel et al., Knives and the Second Amendment, 47 U. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
The brief signers include VC co-conspirators Jonathan Adler, David Kopel, and Todd Zywicki, along with other well-known constitutional law scholars such as James Ely (Vanderbilt), Kurt Lash (University of Illinois), Gary Lawson (BU), Steven Presser (Northwestern), and others. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:57 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, David Kopel discusses the differing approaches of merits briefs filed Monday by the petitioners and the NRA in the gun rights case McDonald v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:29 am by Jeff Welty
For example, Professor David Kopel argues here that if the Social Security Administration promulgates a regulation that would have the effect of prohibiting gun possession by Social Security beneficiaries who have designated a personal representative to manage their financial affairs, it would be unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 2:17 pm by Jon
It led to a discussion by David Kopel on the Volokh Conspiracy, in which I commented:Sasha is correct about the flexibility of Latin word order. [read post]