Search for: "Deal v. Edwards" Results 501 - 520 of 1,082
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
[Cross-reference to Lemley and Pooley, California Restrictive Employment Covenants after Edwards discussing Edwards v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
(Inventive Step)   US Patent Reform CAFC: PTO control over own proceedings, patent reform: Hyatt v Dudas (Hal Wegner) When considering PTO reform, look to KIPO for clues (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Chamber of Commerce urges IP reform (Patent Baristas) (Patently-O) The message to Barack Obama is clear: the USPTO needs new blood and a strong reform agenda (IAM)   US Patents Patent Prosecution Highway pilot with Canadian Intellectual Property Office is extended… [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Dec. 11, 2018) Data Privacy and Data Protection Mishcon de Reya has a two part blog post dealing with the DCMS and ICO data protection guidance and the draft “no deal” DP regulations: What does Brexit mean for data protection? [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
We went on to deal with the extraordinary speed with which phone hacking broke out of its broadsheet ghetto and came to dominate the news agenda and the establishment of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 When I was a young boy, they used to say: "What's good for General Motors is good for this country. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
I rang TV Edwards, Duncan Lewis, Aden and Co, Edwards Duthie and Tower Hamlets Law Centre to name but a few and no one was in a position to take the case on. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Edwards, 222 Tenn. 465, 436 S.W.2d 864, 867 (Tenn. 1969); Lancaster v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
Edwards, 222 Tenn. 465, 436 S.W.2d 864, 867 (Tenn. 1969); Lancaster v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]