Search for: "Delay v. Texas" Results 501 - 520 of 1,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2009, 1:56 pm by Doug Weathers
According to the Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth in Adams v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
Joe Jamail The above video is reportedly of Joe Jamail taking a deposition in Texas in Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
"AP, via Google News, has, "Judge delays execution of condemned Texas inmate," by Juan Lozano.But U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:00 pm by Don Cruse
” Note for Court watchers: This is the same 5-2 vote pattern (with the same two recusals) that emerged from Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:33 pm
  The Texas Supreme Court disagrees. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 168309 (ND CA, Sept. 28, 2018), a California federal district court allowed an Odinist inmate that authorities refused or delayed approval for celebration or collection of funds for religious holidays.In Rials v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The case decision was handed down on January 26, 2010, and was styled, Houston Baptist University, v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 5:38 am by B.W. Barnett
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals articulated this requirement as follows: "Under Article 64.03, a defendant is not entitled to DNA testing unless he first shows that unaltered evidence is available for testing; that identity was an issue in the case; that there is greater than a 50% chance that he would not have been convicted if DNA testing provided exculpatory results; and that the request is not to delay the execution of the sentence. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 6:47 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This is illustrated in the 2000, Court of Appeals [14th Dist.] case styled, Nell Warden v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 9:24 am by Lindsay S. Smith
The United States Supreme Court had stayed the injunction in Texas Top Cop Shop, but a nationwide injunction remained in place due to a January ruling in Samantha Smith and Robert Means v. [read post]