Search for: "Desist v. United States"
Results 501 - 520
of 527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 7:44 am
HRB Royalty, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 10:06 am
[4] Bank Julius Baer v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:50 pm
#14: United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
Background of trademark law Passed by Congress in 1946, the Lanham Act is the source of all Federal trademark law in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 1:23 am
The three United States patents at issue, which cover syringes having needle shield safety devices and may be used with pre-filled pharmaceutical injection syringes, are owned by Saftey Syringes, Inc. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
DPPA was initially introduced in the House of Representatives on March 30, 2006 and would amend title 17, section 2 of the United States Code, by expanding the term, "design," to include "fashion design" and affording protection to fashion designs.[9] An identical bill was also introduced in the Senate on August 2, 2007.[10] DPPA would essentially extend protection to the appearance as a whole of an article of apparel, including its ornamentation, with apparel… [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 3:25 am
Mullen v. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:01 pm
Welcome to Blawg Review #130 -- the Northern Hemisphere edition! [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:59 am
In its decision in Chrismon, et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:07 am
" Even worse, Morris threatens to file suit in Canada, because DirectBuy does business there in addition to the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
., v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:15 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 11:04 am
However, he’d probably be right under United States trademark law. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 8:42 am
KCPA has received two cease and desist letters to discontinue its service. [read post]
8 May 2007, 5:27 am
The following is a glossary of a broad list of legal terms, civil and criminal, state and federal and not just those in a divorce or family law case. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we AFFIRM that decision. 07a0124p.06 2007/04/05 Cress v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
In their briefs and at oral argument, both the Complaint Counsel and Rambus agreed that the Commission was authorized to issue cease and desist orders prohibiting “future deceptive conduct by Rambus. [read post]
