Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-50" Results 501 - 520 of 4,037
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
Stone, 362 N.C. 50, 653 S.E.2d 414 (North Carolina Supreme Court 2007); see also Florida v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
That these are determinative factors for the purposes of Articles 4(1) and 4(2) does not exclude them from consideration under 4(3). [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:33 pm
  Here's why that might be the case:1. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 10:42 am by John Floyd
The court, however, qualified that ruling by saying that just because a juror slept at some point during the trial does not automatically entitle a defendant to new trial relief. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
In any event, this case underscores how the curse of multi-jurisdiction litigation potentially can be a problem for everyone, not just the defendants – although, to be sure, in this case, Wal-Mart probably at this point does not have a problem with the way things turned out, at least so far. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also, there is arguably an even stronger 1-to-1 correspondence between sales made to one and sales lost to another than in Lexmark. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:11 am by Michael Fox
Plaintiffs of course seek a 150% premium (time and one-half) of the newly computed hourly rate, while defendants argue that overtime has already been calculated in. and so the premium should only be 50% or half-pay. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:46 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Authorities say the defendant caused the collision through “reckless driving and actions. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
” delivered by Sir David Eady at a conference on 1 December 2009 he described this as an “issue that merits closer consideration. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 2:05 pm
  If it does, your case will drag out for 2+ years and… Your chances of winning (as plaintiff or defendant) is a roughly 50-50 crap shoot (factoring in a margin of error for sampling error). [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
However, if it does so, it is a deviation from the basic statutory formula and requires an analysis under the factors set forth in Domestic Relations Law § 240(1–b)(f). [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., LLC, 2020 WL 4698984, No. 1:17-cv-142-RJS-DAO (D. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 6:26 am
Over the past 50 years, trademark licensing has emerged as a preferred method of producing and marketing goods in the U.S. [read post]