Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-50" Results 501 - 520 of 4,038
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2022, 6:46 am by Russell Knight
After all, why own 50 storage lockers that have to be cleaned and maintained when you could just own a bond that pays a similar coupon? [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 11:00 pm by Florian Mueller
U.S. antitrust law is defendant-friendly, and the district judge made a number of factual determinations to which the "clear error" standard of review applies. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:04 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
As of March 29, 2022, coverage of the second COVID-19 booster with or without cost-sharing also does not appear to be required to comply with the preventive care mandates of §2713 of the Public Health Service Act [PHSA]) enacted as part of the ACA. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am by Michael C. Dorf
I take Justice Alito to be saying that the Navy can't successfully defend by saying it in fact does grant exemptions, when it doesn't really. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 4:32 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have denied the application; Justice Alito explained his reasoning thus, joined by Justice Gorsuch: By rubberstamping the Government's request for what it calls a "partial stay," the Court does a great injustice to the 35 respondents—Navy Seals and others in the Naval Special Warfare community—who have volunteered to undertake demanding and hazardous duties to defend our country. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:03 pm by Jeff Welty
The appeals court found that $50 was the maximum possible fine because section 22-16 didn’t provide for a fine greater than $50: “[B]ecause Section 22-16 does not expressly state that the maximum fine for a violation of Section 22-16(a) is greater than $50.00, the maximum fine for Defendant’s violation of N.C. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 1:58 pm by Ambrose Stearns, Jr.
Plaintiff attempted to argue that the defendant’s failure to pay the clam was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Such an estimate, however, does not necessarily give a realistic prediction of the risk. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The court explained that G.S. 15A-974(a)(2) “does not provide a mechanism by which [the defendant] could allege evidence was obtained as a result of a substantial violation of Chapter 15. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
Tenth Circuit: “When a defendant raises the qualified-immunity defense, the plaintiff must … establish (1) the defendant violated a federal statutory or constitutional right and (2) the right was clearly established at the time of the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Turns out that the Navy has a 50-step process for adjudicating such accommodation requests that invariably results in their denial. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 7:21 am by Zak Gowen
The bill also relieves some of the burden on proving exclusionary conduct by stating that a violation does not require a finding of, for example: (1) below cost pricing, (2) termination or alteration of a prior course of conduct; (3) harm on both sides of the defendant’s multi-sided platform. [read post]