Search for: "Doe Entities 1-20" Results 501 - 520 of 3,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 3:36 am
(p. 20-21)Applicant argued that the dictionary definitions show that the primary meaning of "booking" relates not to travel but to theater reservations. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:00 am by Michael Risch
  Under proposed 285(c)(1)(G)(2)(A), an interested party is anyone with an interest, including employees. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:28 am by Roel van Woudenberg
            On 25.10.2019, the applicant submitted further argumentation in support of accepting a machine as the inventor, arguing Rule 19(1) EPC does not require that the inventor is a human and explaining that the purpose of Rule 19(1) EPC is to properly identify the inventor. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 10:33 am by John Jascob
She observed that the rule is 15 or 20 years old at this point, and previous Chair Jay Clayton discussed it during his tenure, in addition to Gensler talking about it currently.One important aspect is that the protection in Rule 10b5-1 is an affirmative defense, not a silver bullet, said Avakian. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:46 am by Cari Rincker
It does not typically have an entity-level tax liability.[1] Many entities offer options to enjoy pass-through taxation; however, how an entity accesses this option varies depending upon the type of business. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:00 pm by News Desk
” “Approximately twenty (20) live flying insects and live beetle-type insects too numerous to count were observed on, in, and around an approximate 1-foot x 2-foot area that appeared to be old wet product residues on the floor beneath the trash compactor. [read post]
25 Dec 2012, 10:48 am
Although plaintiff improperly referenced Future City in the Lien, the misdescription of the entity by whom the lienor was employed does not invalidate the. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 8:57 am by Simon Lovegrove (UK)
The FCA also proposes to: (i) extend the scope of MIFIDPRU TP 7 to include former IFPRU investment firms and former consolidating UK CRR parent undertakings where those entities did not obtain approvals under the UK CRR before 1 January 2022; (ii) allow firms and parent entities to update the terms of non-MIFIDPRU 3‑compliant capital instruments issued before 1 January 2022 to make them compliant. [read post]
Class A companies are now those covered entities with at least $20 billion in gross annual revenue in-state in each of the past two fiscal years from business operations of the covered entity and its affiliates: More than 2,000 employees averaged over the past two fiscal years, including those of both the covered entity and all of its affiliates, no matter where located; or More than $1 billion in gross annual revenue in each of the past two fiscal years… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 10:20 am
The court of appeals disagreed, stating that considering damage to business operations generally to prove a constructive taking of the building as a basis for a right to terminate under the lease would be inconsistent with the plain meaning of the lease contract, and that where a contract is plain and unambiguous between sophisticated business entities, it does not become ambiguous by reason of the fact that in its operation it may work a hardship upon one of the parties.What are… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:14 pm by Jared Schwass
This does not include owning a passive interest in a publicly trading company. (5 ILCS 430/5-45) No State employee who works for any State agency that regulates cannabis license holders and who participated personally and substantially in the award of licenses cannot hold an ownership interest in any cannabis license during State employment or within a period of 2 years immediately after termination of State employment. (5 ILCS 430/5-45) No officer of the executive branch or State employee… [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm by Law Lady
Shinseki, 20 No. 1 Westlaw Journal Health Law 7, Westlaw Journal Health Law May 24, 2012 Courts cannot order the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:01 am by Paula Bremner
The Dutch Industries’ Application was abandoned for failure to pay “large entity”[1] fees, as the applicant was a “”large entity” (as opposed to a small entity) at the time of filing. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 4:31 pm by Bryan Hawkins
On April 16, 2020, California Governor Gavin Newsom issued Executive Order N-51-20 (the “Order”). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:17 am by Sam Antar
Frydman was chief executive officer of the general partner, and a 1% owner, of two entities which, while engaged in separate land development transactions, each filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
 The board also does not consider the document mentioned by the appellant, i.e. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
 The board also does not consider the document mentioned by the appellant, i.e. [read post]