Search for: "Does, 1-13" Results 501 - 520 of 21,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
  And it does seem as though … there's no particular reason, and you can think of lots of reasons for the contrary. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:03 pm by Sean Kirby and Joseph Peacock
 As we previously reported in the wake of the issuance of the Department of Labor’s October 13, 2022 proposed rule, the final rule returns to a totality-of-the-circumstances analysis akin to the “Economic Reality Test. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Porta Sophia identifies ~90% (26) of these active applications as highly threatening “Tier 1” status, meaning the claims would do significant damage to the psychedelic field if granted by locking historically utilized therapies behind high paywalls and limiting future research. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:41 am
Feb. 13, 2024) [precedential].Chestek argued that the domicile address requirement was improperly promulgated for two independent reasons: (1) that the USPTO failed to comply with the requirements of notice-and-comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Anna Maria Stein
The Guidance has been published and will be effective from 13 February 2024. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
They begin with rules on Universal Proxy (11/17/21), implementation of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (12/2/21), and Proxy Advisors (7/13/22), and end with rules on Conflicts in Securitizations (11/27/23), Treasury Market Clearing (12/13/23), and SPACs (1/24/24). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes a published criminal law case released by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals during January 2024. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 8:44 am by Holly
February 13, 2024 |  By: Wright Lewis   Who Is Subject To the Corporate Transparency Act   As we discussed in part one of this series, the Corporate Transparency Act is in effect as of January 1, 2024, requiring that private companies report information about their beneficial owners to the Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by David Kessler (US) and Susan Ross (US)
Nor does it disclose to these app developers that it retained their users’ location information for up to five years. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 3:50 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Ct. 2015 (2018), in which the Supreme Court held that the “stop-time rule” at INA 240A(d)(1) is not triggered by an NTA that does not contain the time and place of a hearing in removal proceedings. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 11:30 pm by Chijioke Okorie
However, unlike the former provision, the new provision does way more than speaking to the fact that copyright can be transferred as movable property. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm by USPTO
To learn more about what the guidance is and is not, and to get your questions answered and provide feedback, we invite you to attend our upcoming public webinar on March 5 from 1-2 p.m. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Elspeth Guild
Employees of the Ministry and the company exchanged numerous emails regarding aspects of the creation of the app and copied in the relevant director at the ministry (para 13-15). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog has an article on the role of disinformation in political campaigning and its impact on voters, arguing it does not have the sway on elections that is often assumed. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Howard Gutman
She stated that she was the primary driver and that her boyfriend does not drive the Cadillac. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, the Court of Appeal made clear that the caselaw on bare comment does not prescribe an inflexible rule compelling a court to treat a statement of opinion as if it were fact where the opinion implies that a claimant has done something but does not indicate what that something is [24]. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Additionally, the investigation revealed the franchisee violated child labor rules by hiring children as young as 13-years-old and minors who worked later and longer than permitted by child labor laws at the employer’s three Oakland, Tracy and Newark locations. [read post]