Search for: "Does 1 to 100" Results 501 - 520 of 14,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2009, 7:10 pm by E. Alexandra "Sasha" Golden
Plenty of folks think that a will is just a form -- you can buy a piece of software for less than $100, plug in names and addresses and -- poof! [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
Tomorrow morning, the ACLU will hold a rally in Washington on the unfairness of mandatory minimum sentences, and specifically, the need to repair the 100:1 crack to powder cocaine sentencing disparity. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Here is another textbook example of a disclaimer that does not fulfil the requirements established in G 1/03.The patent proprietor filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the opposed patent.The Board found the (main) request I to lack novelty over document D1 (prior art under A 54(3)(4)), and auxiliary requests II and III not to comply with A 123(2). [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:08 am by shirley
This is part 1 of a series of posts about the new Companies Act. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:14 am by Diane Tweedlie
With respect to Article 100(a) EPC, it was argued, inter alia, that the subject-matter of claim 1 of the granted patent lacked novelty with respect to D1 or D2 and that the subject-matter of claim 1 lacked an inventive step with respect to D1 alone or the combination of D1 and D2.VII. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 7:02 am
The decision also does not disturb the 100-to-1 ratio as it is spelled out in federal law (as opposed to the Guidelines); that ratio still applies at the minimum level of quantities of drugs involved in a given crime. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 7:00 am by William Carleton
[T]he stock must be acquired by the taxpayer in exchange for money or other property (not including stock) or as compensation for services provided to the corporation (this was the rule historically under section 1202 but please confirm with a good CPA or tax lawyer to make sure this carries forward during the 100% exclusion window - I think it does but am not 100% sure - to be safe, pay cash). [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The patent, granted in 2011, had been opposed on the grounds of Article 100(c), 100(b) and 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty and inventive step.In the appealed decision, the opposition division had held that the process claimed in auxiliary request 10 did not add subject-matter and that it was novel. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:31 pm by Daniel Shaviro
 Let's go back to ED-Co, in the scenario where it earned $100 in the Caymans on which it paid zero tax, and $100 in the UK on which it paid $14 of tax. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Donna Ballman
If current trends continue, one in three black males born today can expect to spend time in prison during his lifetime1 in 100 African American women are in prisonThe 13th Amendment has an exception to the abolition of slavery: “Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 10:13 am
Labeled as a “red state,” it is not surprising that Tennessee does not shy away from allowing citizens to carry guns. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 8:34 am by Dennis Crouch
” The second limitation, [f], requires that “the content of Co in the transition metal M1 of the formulae (1) and (2) is from 30% by mole to 100% by mole. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:15 pm by Bill Marler
As a result, CDC continues to identify cases of hepatitis A related to the initial contaminated product. 103 people with hepatitis A have been reported from seven states: Maryland (14), New York (1), North Carolina (1), Oregon (1), Virginia (80), West Virginia (5), and Wisconsin (1). 39 ill people have been hospitalized. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am by Brian Murphy and Jamie Moelis
Employers with 100 or more employees must provide at least 56 hours of paid sick leave per calendar year. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:25 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Main request: Articles 100(a) and 54 EPCThe appellants contested novelty in view of D5 but, for the following reasons, the board does not share this view:3.1 D5 discloses a filter medium comprising a web with a fiber layer and spacer particles (claim 1).A "support layer" is required by claim 1 of the patent in suit, whereas D5 discloses the possibility of a stacked arrangement of layers with the same or different compositions (page 13 lines 22 to 27). [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 9:29 am
As they say, an insane person is one who does the same thing over and over knowing they will not get a different outcome. [read post]