Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 501 - 520 of 3,387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am by Kader Kadem
He added that the right to vote was a right guaranteed in, inter alia, Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:25 am by Blogspot
He added that the right to vote was a right guaranteed in, inter alia, Article 3 of Protocol No. 1. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:50 am by Megan A. Smith, Esq.
 The language of Missouri Senate Bill 54, effective on August 28, 2011, states: By January 1, 2012, every school district must develop a written policy concerning teacher-student communication and employee-student communications. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Here is the SEC’s proposed definition of a venture capital fund for purposes of the exemption: A venture capital fund is any private fund that: (1) Represents to investors and potential investors that it is a venture capital fund; (2) Owns solely: (i) Equity securities issued by one or more qualifying portfolio companies, and at least 80 percent of the equity securities of each qualifying portfolio company owned by the fund was acquired directly from the qualifying portfolio company;… [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 9:38 pm by Charon QC
Section 54(3) is likely to cause confusion among landowners and motorists. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:15 am by Kyle Fleming
Defendants’ miscalculation does not constitute excusable neglect. . . . [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:10 am by Roel van Woudenberg
A European patent application can be refused under Articles 97(2) and 125 EPC if it claims the same subject-matter as a European patent which has been granted to the same applicant and does not form part of the state of the art pursuant to Article 54(2) and (3) EPC.2.1 The application can be refused on that legal basis, irrespective of whether ita) was filed on the same date as, orb) is an earlier application or a divisional application (Article 76(1) EPC) in respect of,… [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 11:30 pm by Rumpole
And here's what FN (1) is: "And we mean it this time." [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 7:40 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The Court concludes that a noncitizen whose NTA does not contain the time-and-date information that §1229(a)(1) requires has no recourse from an in absentia removal order if the Government subsequently provides some followup notice identifying the time and date of the proceeding he missed. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[…] The Board thus finds that the combination of features of claim 1 was directly and unambiguously derivable from the teaching of the description. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by Jessica Kroeze
Independent claim 1 of the main request found allowable by the opposition division reads as follows:"1. [read post]
5 Nov 2005, 11:01 am
"When a revocation does not revoke. [read post]