Search for: "Does 1-80" Results 501 - 520 of 6,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
Thus, the grounds for refusal sub Article 3(1)(b)-(d) do not ensure that a certain sign is generally kept free for use over time.Unlike the absolute grounds for refusal sub Article 3(1)(b)-(d), the absolute ground relating to shapes (Article 3(1)(e) of the Trade Mark Directive) cannot be overcome by acquired distinctiveness [para 79] and, overall, “it overwhelmingly seeks to protect competition” [para 80,… [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:05 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Claim 1 of the second auxiliary request does not involve an inventive step in the light of E1 and the new document E10.Reasons for the Decision1. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am by Jason Rantanen
  It would be a shame if premature overselling of risky policies or settlement disputes led to a bubble popping and a painful contraction. [1] See Aviva Will & David M. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 11:10 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Since 1/1/2020, the revised  Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal (RPBA2020) are in force. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:29 am
The Austin American-Statesman has, " Man spared his life after governor does the right thing . [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
” (R 5.1-1[1]) It is obvious that this guidance is directed towards litigation. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 4:58 am
But Alsup was overruled in January in a 2-1 decision by the Ninth U.S. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:30 pm by nyinjuries
  Given the archaic state of the wrongful death law in New York State that does not permit a family of a decedent to recover for their emotional grief, it’s nice to see good lawyering achieve such a strong overall recovery for a 79-year old who was probably not a wage earner. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:14 am by William Hamilton
Starks, Deconstructing Damages for Destruction of Evidence, 80-AUG Fla. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In other words, the power conferred by A 21(1) to the boards of appeal to review decisions shall not be transferred to the appellants. [read post]