Search for: "Does I through Doe III"
Results 501 - 520
of 6,909
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 4:09 pm
Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas, and by Justice Alito in Parts I, II and III. [read post]
9 May 2013, 6:16 pm
The other day I was looking through all the stats on the blog, to see the most popular posts. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:17 am
Part III analyzes the threats of insurgency and terrorism, and the state response. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:24 am
Tokens are being sold to three groups of people: (i) to the existing holders of certain vouchers, at a discount; (ii) to the general public; and (iii) to app developers and reviewers as rewards. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:09 pm
Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Thomas, and by Justice Alito in Parts I, II and III. [read post]
12 May 2014, 5:59 pm
According to the FTC complaint, Snapchat made several other misrepresentations to users, including: (i) that the app’s structure – which was supposed to delete any video sent – actually allowed such videos to be accessible when a recipient’s phone was connected to a computer; (ii) that the company misrepresented its data collection practices by transmitting geolocation information of users, despite its privacy policy saying that the app does not… [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 5:38 pm
We are in the latter moment, but that does not mean that the former’s time has passed. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 10:57 am
§ 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii); 28 C.F.R. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:48 am
And that number goes up when we consider the large number of guest bloggers who cycle through here, CoOp, and other places. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:54 am
"I figured that I'd be able to get through with the long runs on the weekends, and I didn't do as many of the shorter runs during the week. [read post]
24 May 2014, 10:24 am
It does a balanced and informative job of describing where things stand, including a note on what I view as something of a generational divide. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:03 am
As reported by the IPKat through a breaking news post, yesterday the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its decision in Soulier and Doke, C-301/15. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
The late Marc Soulier,also known as AyerdhalAs reported by this blog through a breaking news post, yesterday the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its decision in Soulier and Doke, C-301/15.This was a reference for a preliminary ruling from the French Conseil d’État (Council of State) and concerned the compatibility with EU law [read: the InfoSoc Directive] of the 2012 French law to allow and regulate the digital… [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 5:01 am
Why does this matter? [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:21 pm
Notice how the conclusion does not even begin to follow from the premise. [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 4:10 pm
Or, as in California (and Maine and Ohio, among other American states), can the popular sovereign in effect wrest control away from the legislature through some process of initiative and referendum? [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:20 pm
"Requesting Mutual Legal Assistance from Canada: A Step-by-Step Guide (2013): "A foreign state may request assistance from Canada in the gathering of evidence or the enforcement of some criminal orders (seizure orders, confiscation orders, fines) through three separate routes: (i) treaty and convention requests, (ii) letters rogatory (court issued non-treaty letter of request) and (iii) non-treaty requests. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, 34 NY2d 22, the Appellate Division said that termination of Petitioner's employment does not shock the conscience given her repeated and prolonged attendance issues, which were the subject of two prior disciplinary proceedings, and her other substantial misconduct.Citing Bolt v NYC Department of Education, 30 NY3d 1065, the court observed that although " .... reasonable minds might disagree over what the proper penalty should have been… [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, 34 NY2d 22, the Appellate Division said that termination of Petitioner's employment does not shock the conscience given her repeated and prolonged attendance issues, which were the subject of two prior disciplinary proceedings, and her other substantial misconduct.Citing Bolt v NYC Department of Education, 30 NY3d 1065, the court observed that although " .... reasonable minds might disagree over what the proper penalty should have been… [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 1:12 pm
Further, said the court, Petitioner did not dispute the absences and lateness noted in Specifications 1 through 6, which "the arbitrator properly found were excessive," and as to which the arbitrator noted that Petitioner failed to seek a medical accommodation until shortly before the charges were filed against her. [read post]
