Search for: "Does I through X"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2023, 9:02 am
No weirder than X AE A-12. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
App'x 409, 411 (10th Cir. 2005). [3] See infra the subheading "Requiring Plaintiffs to Name Themselves. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:45 am
Does this make your more hesitant to rely upon a single provider? [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:37 pm
It does mean though that the solution to the current website litigation crisis will not be found in standards like WCAG 2.x, whether or not they are incorporated into regulations. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 5:53 am
The key question is now whether a ban of Intel-powered iPhones up to the iPhone X (but not the latest models) will actually be enforced. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm
” My client would justly ask: What does that concession mean and what is it worth? [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:43 pm
Think about what this means: there are only 22 x 36 = 712 possible syllables! [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:20 am
Does that mean the VCs were foolish to invest in Delicious? [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
But apparently it does. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
If the distinguishing feature is X, the problem is not to find X, but how to achieve the effect that X has. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
During a recent drive through crazy Nairobi traffic I learned a few important things about family justice journeys in Kenya. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 12:27 pm
It does not create an “international patent,” but it does establish a foundation from which patent applications may later be filed all around the world. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 12:27 pm
It does not create an “international patent,” but it does establish a foundation from which patent applications may later be filed all around the world. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 7:27 am
Title III § 302(a)(v)(II)(cc) (2018)[xiii] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1003(b)[xiv] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1005[xv] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1003(1)(B)(i)[xvi] 31 CFR § 800.901(b)[xvii] America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1004[xviii] Coalition Letter on the National Critical Capabilities and Defense Act by U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:26 am
Obviously (and as I am sure he agrees), the problems that concern him are still there, even if deferral is a free option, if forced repatriation might (and sometimes does) occur at some point. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 4:44 pm
But it is a matter of consensus understanding and centuries-old unbroken practice that the Monarch exercises those powers on the advice of her Ministers—which is a polite way of saying that the elected leadership of Parliament asks the Monarch to do X and the Monarch duly says “I hereby do X. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:12 am
In baseball, the team owner would propose that a player’s salary for the next season should be X and the player (usually through his agent) would suggest his salary should be Y. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 8:12 am
In baseball, the team owner would propose that a player’s salary for the next season should be X and the player (usually through his agent) would suggest his salary should be Y. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
By contrast, the fact that I've decided (internally) that the law doesn't really say X doesn't matter. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 12:07 am
Three times I have fought for disclosure = 3 x costs - 3 X stress and 3 x non-compliance with orders. [read post]
